Whitman Throws Down the Gauntlet Google

The latest from The Third Avenue Fund has firing back at , a I have written about previously, over :

“…invested in at a yield to call of slightly over 14% per annum. The appear to carry very small, or non-existent, , and thus are considered by management to be a near- (albeit the , unlike , are subject to market ).”

“On February 11th, TAVF acquired from , 10,610,425 shares of Common at $12.15 per share. This brought the Fund’s holding to 23,148,845 shares of Common, or about 10% of the issue outstanding. is now strongly capitalized. It ought to qualify easily for an AAA rating with a $17 billion claims paying ability. If so qualified, would be in a position to underwrite a large amount of profitable new business.”

And then Whitman gets the knives out:

“Ackman does not seem to understand the (“P&C”) Insurance business and its sources of profitability. Ackman believes that the Model does not work because the are able to buy an rating so cheaply. The facts are that is one of the more profitable P&C businesses.”

“(Ackman) argues that prices, as determined by marks to market, or mark to model, always deserve 100% weight. This is arrant nonsense. Market prices do deserve dominant weight in an analysis where the portfolio consists wholly of and non-performing loans held in . Market prices deserve little or no weight, when the portfolio consists of performing loans, and in , to be held to maturity.”

“(Ackman) pays little attention to the rules of seniority and priority of payment in evaluating, or understanding, senior tranches of debt. The argument that if an entity is in trouble, every liability on the balance sheet of that entity is also in trouble is strictly “amateur hour”. Frequently, senior issues sail through troubles unscathed.”

Here is my post on from February 2008.

Incoming search terms for the article:

Related posts

Sizde Yorum Gönderin